E3 is fast approaching and the likes of PC proponents Intel and Microsoft will be conspicuously absent from the festivities because of the heavy emphasis on console games at the event.
Although Microsoft decided to opt out of the E3 event, they held their own PC games show in San Francisco this week in order to cut down the competition for face time at E3.
Kevin Unangst, senior global director of Games for Windows said, "As it has morphed, E3 has fundamentally become a console show. We didn't want to just squeeze out some time at a console show."
Rahul Sood, head of HP's Voodoo PC game division expressed similar feeling about how E3 has changed throughout the years. "E3 used to be the Mecca of gaming. I'm skipping it because it's not what it used to be. Now it's just an event called E3."
Unangst is very positive about the state of PC gaming. "There have been a lot of trend pieces about how PC gaming is dying when that is absolutely not happening. It's growing exponentially, thanks to online games, and even faster than the rest of the market."
Worldwide, console games pull $14 billion while PC games sold $11.3 billion. The figures seem to show console games in the lead, but when you consider that PC games are usually cheaper and are going against multiple console platforms, the actual units of games sold for PCs may actually be much closer to consoles then the dollar figures suggest.
So is PC gaming alive and well? That would depend on whose statistics and hype you believe in more. With the pulling out of PC game and hardware companies at E3 and other events, perhaps it is time for the PC industry to put on a mega show of their own. But if it happens, will there be enought content?
[via venturebeat]The Q Opinion on Activision/IW?
Listen Up 2009 Listen Up Awards
Eddie Inzauto Turning On My Sexy Lady
FilmPLOSION! Up Blu-ray Review
Brendon Lindsey When Game Journalism Gets Lazy
Pro Tip Pro Tip: Resident Evil 5: Lost in Nightmares
OneWordReview One Word Review: God of War
Head 2 Head H2H Deathmatch: Bobby Kotick vs. Major Nelson
Jason Fanelli Sex or Violence: Lesser Evil?
Tyler Cameron Do Achievements Ruin Videogames?
OLD SKOOL Ups and Downs of the 8-Bit RPG: Dragon Warrior
VS Node VS Node: Do You Want Files With That?
Mike Murphy Heavy Rain Has Revolutionized Videogames
Top 5 Takedown Top Five PS3 and 360 "Fails"
Dan Crabtree FOX News: The DS is for Pedophiles
Matthew Erazo BioShock 2: The Anti-BioShock
because they know they cant compete so they pull out.
there might be more room at there event. no lines cheap games expensive systems
wealthy people might be able to keep up with this trend.
one pc for every five year to make every game run to there peak.
I will not buy a system every 1 to 2 years to make all my games work perfect.
when I can just buy one console and the first party games to get the most out of every game.
You don't have to buy a whole new system every 1-2 years, you just upgrade intelligently. It's not like you have to replace every component every year or so.
the last game on pc i played was final fantasy vii for the pc.
i really would like to play starcraft II but my pc needs to be completely replaced.
but I really can't afford that right now. so all I have is my console to play.
pc gaming to me is expensive but i only use it for the internet lately.
because the console is giving me a the gaming I need lately.