Sony's Phil Harrison was also in the mood to talk about Nintendo's Wii console at this year's Game Developer's Conference, during the invite-only "Lunch with the Luminaries." He spoke slightly less favorably than Reggie, however.
Speaking with EA Blueprint's Neil Young, he said that third parties have insurmountable competition on the Wii from Nintendo's first-party software. This effectively limits the percentage of the console's intalled userbase that is available to third parties, according to Harrison.
"Your addressable market is only 40% of the installed base."
The EA exec cited EA's Smarty Pants as evidence to the contrary, which has proven to be successful on the Wii, stating that it was "very easy to build very quickly." He also said that Wii development is "...fundamentally much more fun... almost like Xbox Live Arcade [development] to some degree."
So is Phil just opposed to the Wii's cause because he's on the other team, or does he have a valid point? I think that there is indeed some truth to what he is saying, simply because Nintendo is known to produce powerhouse software for their machines, but assigning an exact ratio of 'market availability' seems a bit silly. Each game that is brought to market appeals to a particular sector of gamers based on the game's content.
Kyle Stallock
Updated June 4th, 2008
Indie Games Journalism
Brendon Lindsey
Updated October 19, 2008
Blu-Ray Review: Bond...
Frank Ling
Updated: Aug. 1th, 2008 Are you a game snob?
Eddie Inzauto
Updated Wed, October 28
Silent Hill scribblings
GamerNode needs your help. Register
now and join thousands of gamers in a
crusade to spread the word of
GamerNode!
Join the Node Army!
Phil doesn't really have a point. If the first party software is high quality then the third party must surpass it to do well.
All he's really said is that Lower Quality Titles So Better On PS.
He has a very good point. 3rd party games don't sell because people buy Nintendo platforms for Nintendo games. it's no huge secret.