
At least Ubisoft seems to think so. An article from GamesIndustry.biz is reporting that Ubisoft is already adding staff to work on future technology and development for new consoles in 2012. Mind you this comes with no announcements from Sony, Microsoft, or Nintendo regarding any new consoles.
As a gamer, I don't even want to start thinking about the next generation of home consoles. And if I were Microsoft, Sony, or Nintendo, I wouldn't want to either. Both Sony and Microsoft have been hit hard with layoffs while Nintendo continues to annihilate everything in its path with the Wii and DS, so they have no need to come out with another console. But that's from a business standpoint.
So why do developers think it's a good idea to start working on next-gen stuff instead of perfecting the hardware that's already out? They should be rewarding gamers who invest a great amount of time and money into their hobby with great, worthwhile products throughout a console's lifespan. Instead, you sometimes see developers half-assing it through the second half of a console's lifecycle because they're starting to focus on the next console. Granted this isn't probably true for most devs, but hearing that a major third party developer like Ubisoft is already ramping up for the next generation of consoles bugs me.
Let's not forget that some of a system's best games come late in its lifecycle. The PS2 had God of War II, Rogue Galaxy, Persona 3, Odin Sphere, and recently Persona 4 and Yakuza 2. The Nintendo 64 had Conker's Bad Fur Day. All were late-in-cycle games that were released to critical acclaim. There's no reason why this can't happen on the Wii, Xbox 360, or especially PS3.
Of all the systems, the PS3 has the best chance to actually be a leader in hardware, yet it's last. It has the most value of the three consoles, but its price point is still holding it back. It is super powerful and uses Blu-Ray discs that can hold a crap ton of data, yet we still see multiplatform games that look worse and underperform on it. Sony has continued to hype it as a system with tremendous pontential that will last 10 years, but how much longer will it be before gamers just don't care anymore? Pontential isn't worth anything if it's never used, and I think we're only just beginning to see what it is capable of. Now is the time for developers to really start tapping into that pontential and create something that's mind-boggling-oh-my-God-awesome, so why ruin that with talks of the next wave of systems?
The Q Big titles of Q4
Listen Up Video Games Live in Philly
Eddie Inzauto The games industry is doomed? Not really.
FilmPLOSION! Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Blu-ray Review
Brendon Lindsey Lazy Game Journalism
Pro Tip Pro Tip: Demon's Souls
OneWordReview OWR: Kingdom Hearts
You Win! "That Makes Sense" Award
Head 2 Head Nathan Drake vs. Indiana Jones
Jason Fanelli Open Challenge to "Fair Journalism"
Tyler Cameron When Enough is Enough
OLD SKOOL 8-Bit RPG: Dragon Warrior
VS Node VS Node No Bounds
Revisited No More Heroes, Revisited
Phil Williams Games On Demand - The Future?
Mike Murphy Fox News Bias on Gaming an Insult to Journalism
Top 5 Takedown Top 5 Zombie Games