In recent years, the issue of censorship and regulation of videogames has been one of great concern. It affects not only to the members of the videogame industry and the gaming community, but any defenders of liberty and freedom across the country. Now that may sound a bit dramatic, but it is essentially the case.
I was playing Manhunt 2 earlier this week - the Wii version. (On a side note, I thought the gesture-based controls were masterfully...uh...executed, but I have to admit that I felt a bit criminal, or at least mildly sadistic, while performing the actions) What bothered me more than the icky feelings i had while performing kills, though, was the fact that the game has been so heavily modified (CENSORED) from its original form. You've probably already read/heard/seen, but the executions in the game are almost completely obfuscated. I couldn't tell what was even happening half the time.
That brings me to the point of this bundle of text - how do we stop the censorship, and what, if any, good can legislation do for the state of gaming? Where I have been leaning is toward the advocacy of certain limitations. Now before you start your cries of "heresy!" and "traitor!" please understand that these would only be in order to expand the freedoms of developers and to open up entirely new realms of creativity in which they could express themselves.
The way it works now is that each game (well, game footage) is sent to the ESRB and rated. This ratings board, mind you, is made up of "...a wide range of backgrounds, races, and ages and have no ties to the interactive entertainment industry. Raters include retired school principals, parents, professionals, and other individuals from all walks of life." That's not exactly a jury of one's peers. If the content is deemed "too offensive" by these outsiders, then it is altered for release. It has been effectively censored.

So why would game makers tone down their games? Because manufacturers such as Nintendo and Sony won't release an "Adults Only" game on any of their consoles. Why won't they release those kinds of games? Public outcry and bad press. If there were rules in place beyond the voluntary ESRB ratings board that would take the blame off of anyone in the industry itself, then it would be much more likely that those companies would allow a wider range of content to be played on their hardware.
What I would propose is that all games be rated, and left as-is. I would also propose that console manufacturers allow games of all ratings to be released for their respective platforms. Finally - and this is the interesting part - I would propose that regulatory bodies enforce *ONLY* that the software be sold to the proper audiences - the audiences for which they were intended. That way, all content originally crafted as part of the interactive experience could actually find its way into the final retail box, sans censorship. Many of these so-called "games" (we know how I feel about that term) are made for adults, and we want them...uncut. This is not Romper Room, and censorship is just a gross misquote of the works' creators.
With movies, there is a similar system in place. Movies are rated by the MPAA, and then the viewing of those movies is restricted to the age group that the rating calls for. Nobody tries to censor films or get them taken out of theaters, because kids aren't allowed to watch them. It's not a perfect system, and certainly has its loopholes, but at least it stops the mommy police from crying.
As for music, the RIAA (another internal ratings board) plants the famous "PARENTAL ADVISORY" sticker on the front of albums that contain objectionable lyrics. Retailers then keep these reserved for their adult patrons. Again, little crying.
So if the ESRB was called the VGAA, would things be different? Would their ratings somehow be more valid in the eyes of the government? As things stand right now, the videogame industry gets no respect. Laws implemented in the current state of affairs would really only be slapped on top of all the media hogwash, and no progress could be made. If everyone would work together, however, the industry could use the government's desire for regulations to set up a fully-integrated system, ultimately benefiting the creative landscape of videogame design as we know it.
Heck, they might even become a legitimate art form in the public eye...
Kyle Stallock
Updated June 4th, 2008
Indie Games Journalism
Brendon Lindsey
Updated June 23, 2008
Blu-Ray Review: Jumper
Frank Ling
Updated: June 6th, 2008 Laid off at game job
Eddie Inzauto
Updated July 4th, 2008
Second chances
GamerNode needs your help. Register
now and join thousands of gamers in a
crusade to spread the word of
GamerNode!
Join the Node Army!
Of course there is still the argument of developers self-censoring in order to put themselves in a place where they can sell to the largest market. I can't say that wouldn't happen, but at least the opportunity would be there for the truly creative and convicted to produce material that is true to their original vision.
In a perfect world, the work would all be done for the craft, itself... and not for the $$$.
I would be all on board with the idea of total freedom of speech for game developers if it wasn't for games like Manhunt 2. It's not that I find it offensive necessarily, but I think it's ridiculous that people try to hide behind the constitution when their motive for creating this game had nothing to do with artistic expression and everything to do with exploiting controversy to make a profit.
My view on this topic stands. This (right now) will not be considered by our US government. Violent games are a "Hot topic" in politics as of now. I hate to sound like the anarchist that I am, but our government will only due what suits them best. If they were really concerned about our kids, they would address real threatening issues like childhood obesity. But taking away the happy meal would upset many screaming kids and the moms who don't want to cook for them. Plus, cut out the under 17 crowd, and the the clown would have a bloody nose (financially). And our #1 concern as a nation when devising a law is "How much will this cost us?". I have other examples, but let's move on.
Your hope for videogames to be viewed as a legitimate art form is well under way. I think most of the world already sees this, though some may not want to admit it. When the last of the folks in our government (who's video library mostly consists of vhs tapes) die or get replaced, a new age will dawn.
Food for thought concerning videogames as a legitimate art form in the public eye:
Wal-Mart is the largest retailer I can think of in the US.
The videogame section at my Wal-Mart is just as large as the movie section. Not to shabby for some illegitimate, sub culture, niche market, hobby.
I've said it before, I've said it again--
It amazes me how many people will openly deride a game such as Manhunt for being brutal and gory, not fit for consumption, a bane against people everywhere, only around to stir up controversy, but will then turn around and not even bat an eye (and spend millions at the box office) for movies like Saw, Hostel, and Hills Have Eyes.
You know,rtanger, the masses are programed. They are told what to do and believe and they comply.
08 +1
10 read command
20 go to 08
30 run program
Sad to say (sorry I forgot most of basic. There is a good chance I have that wrong in wording.) but the masses intellect could be run on an apple II. I can not stand circular logic either.
Ops, I forgot
28 spit uneducated rhetoric
Manhunt 2 may in fact serve a very important and very interesting psychological purpose for those who play it. I'll talk about that in my next column...it's got me curious...
Catharsis?
Ninjalegend, you listen too to much political rock dont you? seriously, calm down.
It's just a case of the people running things still seeing games as entertainment for children. Why have an AO rating for videogames if children play it!?
In a few years when we start seeing more of the Nintendo Generation getting into office and being put in charge of these boards, things will change. In the meantime, just laugh at all the idiots who try to protect the children with their roundabout logic.
lol @ ninjalegend
"The videogame section at my Wal-Mart is just as large as the movie section. Not to shabby for some illegitimate, sub culture, niche market, hobby."
"I hate to sound like the anarchist that I am,"
Rofl, You're an anarchist who shops at Walmart?
Dude, definition from wikipedia: Anarchism is defined by The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics as "the view that society can and should be organized without a coercive state.
Wal mart is capitalism at its finest. Even if the government were to fall, it would still exist, just like you and me.
Capitalism and government are not the same. A lot of people f that up. Don't feel pregnant.